Help on Tele2, tariffs, questions

Gave world literature non-trivial heroes. Through literary creativity, he illuminated the modern era, the attitude to eternal values ​​and human characters. The writer worked in difficult times, when every book, play and story was subjected to strict censorship. Most of the author's works gained popularity years after publication.

History of creation

The story "Heart of a Dog" was conceived by the author back in 1925. Bulgakov spent three months working on it. Difficulties with the publication of works due to censorship and the uncertainty of the author did not leave hope for the publication of the story. She repeatedly copied by hand and retyped to pass from hand to hand in the circle of Bulgakov's close friends and acquaintances. Authorities learned about the "Heart of a Dog" only in 1926. This happened by accident. The writer was searched by the OGPU, whose employees found the manuscript.

The work traveled through the archives of the Soviet special services and remained inaccessible to the public for a long time. There are several editions of the story, which are stored in the Russian State Library. Their analysis helps to assess the degree of confusion in the publication history of the work.

The first edition contained an image of the political realities of the Soviet Union and references to specific representatives of the authorities. One of the versions of the manuscript, the author independently provided the almanac "Nedra" for publication. The product gave the impression of being unreliable. He himself banned the publication of the story, calling it a sharp image of modernity. Readers learned about the fate of Bulgakov's characters in the era of perestroika, when censorship weakened.

The plot of the story combined elements of fantasy and realism. It contained criticism of the authorities, so it gained popularity in the 1960s. The publication of the story in the 1990s elevated him to the heights of world literature. Bulgakov described the tragedy of the people through the conflict of characters who could not find mutual understanding and a common language. There are three main characters in the story. The story is told in the form of a monologue of a dog that was experimented on. The events are covered in the diary of Dr. Bormenthal.

"Dog's heart"

The story tells about a bizarre experiment that two doctors ventured: Professor Preobrazhensky and Bormental. Ivan Arnoldovich Bormenthal was an assistant professor, thanks to whom his biography was formed in the best way. The teacher took a student without a livelihood to the department, and then took him as an assistant.

Bormental has a positive characteristic. This is an educated young man who knows the value of his own words. Despite his youth, he demonstrates responsibility and seriousness, which wins Preobrazhensky's trust. Therefore, he has been present at the experiment from the moment it began, when the dog Sharik got into the professor's house. Considering the teacher a genius, the doctor follows the orders of the professor and sees scientific experience in the actions taken.

Observing the experiment, Bormenthal draws up reports and rejoices in the progress in the work begun. Over time, he moved to the professor, as the experiment required full attention to the ward. The new man needed participation and lessons. Bormental more than once participated in acute situations, which he created, and he wrote a denunciation against him. The doctor uses force to subdue Sharikov, and completely surrenders to the educational process, forgetting about his personal life.

Sharikov's antics infuriate Bormental, but since the experiment has important scientific significance, the doctor restrains himself. The test subject is getting more and more arrogant every day. Realizing that the experiment has begun to bring torment, the young man takes on the burden of responsibility, not finding out who is right in this situation.

Bulgakov entrusted Bormental with the task of neutralizing the ward when he, shaking his revolver, threatened others. With a steady hand, he shot the test subject, saving the professor from having to make a decision on his own. The author deliberately made Bormental a positive character, emphasizing the importance of honor and human dignity. In the decision of the hero, one can see the decision that Bulgakov himself would have made, because he painted the images of the heroes from his acquaintances, based on his own experience and reflections.

The presence of Bormental in scientific developments is important, since his participation made the work of Preobrazhensky debugged, like a clockwork. Being the support of the teacher, he devoted himself entirely to the cause, with the enviable devotion of a grateful student. Realizing that the assumptions and calculations were made inferiorly, colleagues return Sharikov to his usual body, saving themselves from a terrible burden.

Bormental is a talented specialist who has become a reliable rear mentor. This was partly due to the active participation of the professor in the fate of the student. But the love of the young man for the work in which he was engaged was also of great importance. Remaining in the shadow of the teacher, Bormental was the foundation, thanks to which Preobrazhensky's research was successful.

Screen adaptations

Bulgakov's story "Heart of a Dog" was not popular with filmmakers. The first film based on the work was shot in collaboration between Italian and German authors under the direction of director Alberto Lattuada. Actor Mario Adorf played the role of Dr. Bormenthal in the film.

In the Soviet Union, the book was filmed once. In the project, released in 1988, he embodied Dr. Bormenthal.

The great Russian writer is widely known for his brilliant and, at the same time, humorous works. His books have long been dismantled into quotations, witty and well-aimed. And even if not everyone knows who wrote "The Heart of a Dog", then many have seen a great movie based on this story.

In contact with

Summary of the plot

How many chapters in Heart of a Dog - along with the epilogue 10. The action of the work takes place in Moscow at the beginning of the winter of 1924.

1. First, the dog's monologue is described, in which the dog appears smart, observant, lonely and grateful to the one who fed.
2. The dog feels how its beaten body hurts, remembers how it was beaten and poured with boiling water by the janitors. The dog feels sorry for all these poor people, but more for himself. How compassionate women and passers-by fed.
3. A passing gentleman (Professor Preobrazhensky) treats her to Krakow - a good boiled sausage and calls for him. The dog walks meekly.
4. The following is a story about how the dog Sharik acquired his abilities. And the dog knows a lot - colors, some letters. At the apartment, Preobrazhensky calls in Dr. Bormenthal's assistant, and the dog feels he has fallen into a trap again.
5. All attempts to fight back fail and stupefaction sets in. Nevertheless, the animal woke up, albeit bandaged. Sharik hears how the professor teaches him to be affectionate and caring, to feed him well.

The dog woke up

A well-fed and rejuvenated dog, Preobrazhensky takes with him to an appointment. Here Sharik sees the patients: an old man with green hair, feeling like a young man again, an old woman in love with a cheat and asking to transplant monkey ovaries into her, and many, many others. Suddenly, four visitors from the administration of the house came, all in leather jackets, boots and dissatisfied with how many rooms there were in the professor's apartment. After a call and a conversation with an unknown person, they embarrassedly leave.

Further events:

1. The dinner of Professor Preobrazhensky and the doctor is described. Over food, the scientist talks about what brought only destruction and deprivation. Galoshes are stolen, apartments are not heated, rooms are taken away. The dog is happy, because he is full, warm, nothing hurts him. Unexpectedly in the morning after the call, the dog was again taken to the examination room and euthanized.
2. An operation is described to transplant Sharik's seminal glands and pituitary gland from a criminal and a brawler who was killed during the arrest.
3. Excerpts from the diary kept by Ivan Arnoldovich Bormental are given. The doctor describes how the dog gradually becomes a man: he gets up on his hind legs, then legs, begins to read and talk.
4. The situation in the apartment is changing. People walk around oppressed, there are traces of disorder everywhere. The balayka is playing. A former ball settled in the apartment - a short, rude, aggressive little man who demands a passport and invents a name for himself - Polygraph Poligrafovich Sharikov. He is not embarrassed by the past and does not care at all. Most Polygraph hates cats.
5. Dinner is described again. Sharikov changed everything - the professor swears and refuses to accept patients. The communists quickly took over the polygraph and taught their ideals, which turned out to be close to him.
6. Sharikov demands to be recognized as his heir, to allocate a part in the apartment of Professor Preobrazhensky and to issue a residence permit. Then he tries to rape the professor's cook.
7. Sharikov gets a job trapping stray animals. According to him, cats will be made into “polts”. He blackmails the typist into living with him, but the doctor saves her. The professor wants to expel Sharikov, but he is threatened with a gun. It is twisted and there is silence.
8. The commission, which came to rescue Sharikov, finds a half-dog, half-man. Soon, Sharik is sleeping again at the professor's table and rejoices at his luck.

main characters

The symbol of science in this story is the luminary of medicine - professor, the name of Preobrazhensky from the story "Heart of a Dog" Philip Filippovich. The scientist is looking for ways to rejuvenate the body, and finds - this is the transplantation of the seminal glands of animals. Old people become men, women hope to throw off a dozen years. The transplantation of the pituitary gland and testicles, and the heart that was transplanted to the dog in the “Heart of a Dog” from a murdered criminal is just another experiment of the famous scientist.

His assistant, Dr. Bormenthal, a young representative of miraculously preserved noble norms and decency, was the best student and remained a faithful follower.

Former dog - Polygraph Poligrafovich Sharikov - a victim of the experiment. Those who only watched the movie especially remembered what the hero from "Heart of a Dog" played. Obscene verses and jumps on a stool became the author's find of the scriptwriters. In the story, Sharikov simply strummed without interruption, which terribly annoyed Professor Preobrazhensky, who appreciated classical music.

So, for the sake of this image of a driven, stupid, rude and ungrateful peasant, the story was written. Sharikov wants only to live beautifully and eat deliciously, does not understand beauty, norms of relations between people, lives by instinct. But Professor Preobrazhensky believes that the former dog is not dangerous for him, Sharikov will bring much more harm to Shvonder and other communists who patronize and teach him. After all, this created person carries in himself all the lowest and worst that is inherent in man, does not have any moral guidelines.

The criminal and organ donor Klim Chugunkin seems to be only mentioned in Heart of a Dog, but it was his negative qualities that were transferred to a kind and intelligent dog.

Theory of the origin of images

Already in the last years of the existence of the USSR, they began to say that the prototype of Professor Preobrazhensky was Lenin, and Sharikov was Stalin. Their historical relationship is similar to the dog story.

Lenin brought the wild criminal Dzhugashvili closer, believing in his ideological stuffing. This man was a useful and desperate communist, he prayed for their ideals and spared no life and health.

True, in recent years, as some close associates believed, the leader of the proletariat realized the true essence of Joseph Dzhugashvili and even wanted to remove him from his entourage. But animal cunning and fury helped Stalin not only to hold on, but also to take a leadership position. And this is indirectly confirmed by the fact that, despite the year of writing "The Heart of a Dog" - 1925, the story was printed in the 80s.

Important! This idea is supported by some allusions. For example, Preobrazhensky loves the opera "Aida", and Lenin's mistress Inessa Armand. The typist Vasnetsov, who repeatedly flickers in close connection with the characters, also has a prototype - the typist Bokshanskaya, who is also associated with two historical figures. Bokshanskaya became a friend of Bulgakov.

Problems posed by the author

Bulgakov, confirming the status of a great Russian writer, in a relatively short story was able to pose a number of extremely acute problems that are still relevant today.

First

The problem of the consequences of scientific experiments and the moral right of scientists to interfere with the natural course of development. Preobrazhensky first wants to slow down the passage of time by rejuvenating old people for money and dreaming of finding a way to restore youth to everyone.

The scientist is not afraid to use risky methods, transplanting the ovaries of animals. But when the result is a person, the professor first tries to educate him, and then generally returns him to the appearance of a dog. And from the moment Sharik realizes himself as a man, the very scientific dilemma begins: who is considered a man, and whether the action of a scientist will be considered murder.

Second

The problem of relations, more precisely, the confrontation between the rebellious proletariat and the surviving nobility, had a painful and bloody character. The arrogance and aggressiveness of Shvonder and those who came with them is not an exaggeration, but rather a frightening reality of those years.

Sailors, soldiers, workers and people of the bottom filled the cities and estates quickly and cruelly. The country was flooded with blood, the former rich people were starving, they gave their last for a loaf of bread and hastily went abroad. A few were able not only to survive, but also to maintain their standard of living. They still hated them, although they were afraid.

Third

The problem of general ruin and the fallacy of the chosen path has already arisen more than once in Bulgakov's works. The writer lamented the old order, culture and the smartest people dying under the onslaught of the crowd.

Bulgakov - a prophet

And yet, what the author wanted to say in Heart of a Dog. Many readers and admirers of his work feel such a prophetic motive. Bulgakov seemed to be showing the communists what kind of person of the future, the homunculus, they are growing in their red test tubes.

Born as a result of an experiment by a scientist working for the needs of the people and protected by a higher projection, Sharikov threatens not only the aging Preobrazhensky, this creature hates absolutely everyone.

The expected discovery, a breakthrough in science, a new word in the social structure turns into just a stupid, cruel criminal, strumming on a balika, strangling the unfortunate animals, those from among which he himself came out. Sharikov's goal is to take away the room and steal money from "dad".

"Heart of a Dog" M. A. Bulgakov - Summary

Dog's heart. Michael Bulgakov

Conclusion

The only way out for Professor Preobrazhensky from the "Heart of a Dog" is to pull himself together and admit the failure of the experiment. The scientist finds the strength to admit his own mistake and correct it. Can others do it...

The subject of the work

At one time, the satirical story of M. Bulgakov caused a lot of talk. In "Heart of a Dog" the heroes of the work are bright and memorable; the plot is fantasy mixed with reality and a subtext in which sharp criticism of Soviet power is openly read. Therefore, the work was very popular among dissidents in the 60s, and in the 90s, after its official publication, it was completely recognized as prophetic.

The theme of the tragedy of the Russian people is clearly visible in this work, in the "Heart of a Dog" the main characters enter into an irreconcilable conflict among themselves and will never understand each other. And, although the proletarians won in this confrontation, Bulgakov in the novel reveals to us the whole essence of the revolutionaries and their type of new person in the person of Sharikov, leading to the idea that they will not create or do anything good.

There are only three main characters in Heart of a Dog, and the narration is mainly conducted from Bormental's diary and through the dog's monologue.

Characteristics of the main characters

Sharikov

The character that appeared as a result of the operation from the mongrel Sharik. The transplantation of the pituitary and gonads of the drunkard and rowdy Klim Chugunkin turned a sweet and friendly dog ​​into Polygraph Polygraphych, a parasite and a hooligan.
Sharikov embodies all the negative features of the new society: he spits on the floor, throws cigarette butts, does not know how to use the restroom and constantly swears. But even this is not the worst - Sharikov quickly learned to write denunciations and found a calling in the murder of his eternal enemies, cats. And while he deals only with cats, the author makes it clear that he will do the same with people who stand in his way.

This is the low power of the people and Bulgakov saw a threat to the whole society in the rudeness and narrow-mindedness with which the new revolutionary government solves problems.

Professor Preobrazhensky

An experimenter who uses innovative developments in solving the problem of rejuvenation through organ transplants. He is a well-known world scientist, a surgeon respected by all, whose "speaking" surname gives him the right to experiment with nature.

Used to live in a big way - servants, a house of seven rooms, chic dinners. His patients are former nobles and the highest revolutionary officials who patronize him.

Preobrazhensky is a solid, successful and self-confident person. The professor - an opponent of any terror and Soviet power, calls them "blathers and idlers." He considers affection the only way to communicate with living beings and denies the new government precisely for radical methods and violence. His opinion: if people are accustomed to culture, then devastation will disappear.

The rejuvenation operation gave an unexpected result - the dog turned into a man. But the man came out completely useless, not amenable to education and absorbing the worst. Philipp Philippovich concludes that nature is not a field for experiments, and he interfered in its laws in vain.

Dr. Bormenthal

Ivan Arnoldovich is completely devoted to his teacher. At one time, Preobrazhensky took an active part in the fate of a half-starved student - he enrolled in the department, and then took him on as an assistant.

The young doctor tried in every possible way to culturally develop Sharikov, and then moved to the professor altogether, as it became more and more difficult to cope with a new person.

The apotheosis was the denunciation that Sharikov wrote against the professor. At the climax, when Sharikov took out a revolver and was ready to use it, it was Bromenthal who showed firmness and rigidity, while Preobrazhensky hesitated, not daring to kill his creation.

The positive characterization of the heroes of "Heart of a Dog" emphasizes how important honor and dignity are for the author. Bulgakov described himself and his relatives in many of the features of both doctors, and in many respects would have acted the same way as they did.

Shvonder

The newly elected chairman of the house committee, who hates the professor as a class enemy. This is a schematic hero, without deep reasoning.

Shvonder completely bows to the new revolutionary government and its laws, and sees in Sharikov not a person, but a new useful unit of society - he can buy textbooks and magazines, participate in meetings.

Sh. can be called Sharikov's ideological mentor, he tells him about the rights in Preobrazhensky's apartment and teaches him to write denunciations. The chairman of the house committee, because of his narrow-mindedness and lack of education, always hesitates and passes in conversations with the professor, but this makes him hate him even more.

Other heroes

The list of characters in the story would not be complete without two au pairs - Zina and Daria Petrovna. They recognize the superiority of the professor, and, like Bormental, are completely devoted to him and agree to commit a crime for the sake of their beloved master. They proved this at the time of the second operation to turn Sharikov into a dog, when they were on the side of the doctors and exactly followed all their instructions.

You got acquainted with the characterization of the heroes of Bulgakov's "Heart of a Dog", a fantastic satire that anticipated the collapse of Soviet power immediately after its appearance - the author, back in 1925, showed the whole essence of those revolutionaries and what they are capable of.

Artwork test

In the history of Russian literature, three authors stand out whose texts must be read between the lines: Veresaev, Chekhov and Bulgakov. An amazing coincidence that they were all doctors. What is reflected in the work. Chekhov has many works about representatives of this profession. Mikhail Afanasyevich does not lag behind: “Notes of a Young Doctor”, “Fatal Eggs”. And, of course, a story about the unique experiment of Dr. Preobrazhensky - "The Heart of a Dog".

The sci-fi story tells how Professor Filipp Filippovich performs an operation to transplant the dog's pituitary gland and ovaries of the brawler, drunkard Klim Chugunkin, who was killed in a tavern brawl.

The image of Professor Preobrazhensky

The doctor's surname is speaking, like most heroes of classic novels. Transformation is the goal of his activity. At the same time, the structure of the surname reminds of a certain nobility. And even noble origin, which the hero did not possess. He is the son of a clergyman, as the author of the work himself. This is not their only common feature.

This is a wise, educated, middle-aged man. Philip Philipovich is the luminary of world medicine. He strives to do his job as well as possible, in this he sees the meaning of the life of every person. The division of labor is an important component of society, in his opinion. The hero is a true creator, moral, highly moral. He is harsh in his judgments. He hates the proletariat and other fruits of the revolution, which again brings him closer to the writer. Although the uncle of Mikhail Afanasyevich, Dr. N.M. Pokrovsky, who lived and worked in the capital.

Unperturbed, sensible, somewhat cold. He slaughters guinea pigs without pity. Has no fear of death. It is enough to listen carefully to the words when he speaks of a "suitable death" for a slight chill of horror to prick.

At the same time, the hero is good. He is against any form of violence. To the surprise of the household, who do not understand how he could lure Sharik, Philipp Philippovich says that only caress can achieve something from a living being. It sounds bold, but wise thought that any terror will not succeed: neither red, nor white, nor brown. And here the author foresees the defeat of fascism in the form of brown terror.

The professor devoted his life to medicine. Not only a good monetary incentive stimulated him to work: daily practice, scientific discoveries, bold experiments. He sought to help people in gaining health and youth. The doctor has been doing experiments on rejuvenation for a long time. And he has already achieved certain results, many grateful patients have appeared.

The doctor's idealism is shattered when Polygraph Poligrafovich grows up in the house. People like him only understand the language of power. Liberalism, humanism, good manners, politeness are weaknesses for them. He is like Sharik himself, who has been beaten more than once and scalded with boiling water. But he grabbed his legs, bit only those who were afraid of him, showed weakness, was harmless to him.

Polygraph Poligrafovich Sharikov

This hero absorbed two images at once, reborn into a new personality. Born, by transplantation to a dog of the human pituitary gland and seminal glands, a homunculus.

The donor, Klim Chugunkin, was a young man with no education and no purpose in life. His existence was filled with taverns, playing the balalaika, alcohol, vulgarity, violation of the law. The hero has multiple convictions.

Sharik himself is a yard dog. All he saw was beatings, humiliation, hunger, bullying. He was abused and maimed. All I heard was obscene language, screams and various sounds of the streets of Moscow. To feed himself, he searched for food in "weed boxes" and garbage dumps. But even here there were those who felt sorry for the scum, like the cook of the "normal food" canteen, who scalded his side with boiling water. To survive, Sharik even learned to read. I started with the name of the pavilion "Glavryba", but read it the other way around. Bormental's version is erroneous, the reason is not the crossing of the dog's optic nerves. And the fact that at the beginning of the inscription was a policeman and always had to run up from the end, fearing cruelty and beatings.

What could happen when two destitute and embittered creatures were combined? Sharikov is an evil, petty, obscene, drunkard, disgusting type. His first words are swear words. This is the entire vocabulary of Klim and the dog for two. A person who is ready to serve everyone who feeds like a homeless dog. But safely ready to betray for a bigger jackpot, like a criminal. Feeling neither love nor pity for anyone, even for the same orphaned animals as he himself was.

Dr. Bormenthal

A young and talented assistant professor "of world renown". A well-mannered, intelligent, extremely decent person. Enough emotional, aching soul for science. Sincerely loves the professor as a teacher, mentor, close person.

Attractive in appearance. Sharik in his thoughts called him "bitten handsome" or simply "bitten" because he bit him on the leg. It is known that Daria Petrovna (the cook) was in love with him, even secretly stole a photo from the album.

The young man is kind and patient. He loses his temper only when they insult Preobrazhensky.

Shvonder and his entourage

At its core, this is not a person, but a public person, an average proletarian. The new head of the house committee, elected by the housing association at the general meeting. As a typical representative of this social stratum, he sincerely hates class enemies. One of them considers Professor Preobrazhensky, who occupies seven rooms. Tries to use Sharikov as a weapon.

For the head of the house committee, it is not the person that is important, but the certifying paper: "A document is the most important thing in the world." It does not matter to him which way Polygraph Poligrafovich appeared in the world, what he is, if only he was registered and put on military records.

Shvonder is surrounded by a peculiar retinue. The same typical, average proletarians. The image of Vyazemskaya stands out from them - the head of the cultural department of the house. She has no name, individual qualities and even gender. Nothing personal, just public. Vyazemskaya can be compared with the image of Commissar Polyakova, the mother of Iskra, in B. Vasiliev's story "Tomorrow there was a war." She also had no gender, age, personal life, name, but only the proud title of "Commissioner".

Conclusion

There is no rich polyphony of images in Heart of a Dog. There are main characters whose portrait and personality are described in great detail. And minor characters, devoid of individuality, typical of their class.

The subject of the work

At one time, the satirical story of M. Bulgakov caused a lot of talk. In "Heart of a Dog" the heroes of the work are bright and memorable; the plot is fantasy mixed with reality and a subtext in which sharp criticism of Soviet power is openly read. Therefore, the work was very popular among dissidents in the 60s, and in the 90s, after its official publication, it was completely recognized as prophetic.

The theme of the tragedy of the Russian people is clearly visible in this work, in the "Heart of a Dog" the main characters enter into an irreconcilable conflict among themselves and will never understand each other. And, although the proletarians won in this confrontation, Bulgakov in the novel reveals to us the whole essence of the revolutionaries and their type of new person in the person of Sharikov, leading to the idea that they will not create or do anything good.

There are only three main characters in Heart of a Dog, and the narration is mainly conducted from Bormental's diary and through the dog's monologue.

Characteristics of the main characters

Sharikov

The character that appeared as a result of the operation from the mongrel Sharik. The transplantation of the pituitary and gonads of the drunkard and rowdy Klim Chugunkin turned a sweet and friendly dog ​​into Polygraph Polygraphych, a parasite and a hooligan.
Sharikov embodies all the negative features of the new society: he spits on the floor, throws cigarette butts, does not know how to use the restroom and constantly swears. But even this is not the worst - Sharikov quickly learned to write denunciations and found a calling in the murder of his eternal enemies, cats. And while he deals only with cats, the author makes it clear that he will do the same with people who stand in his way.

This is the low power of the people and Bulgakov saw a threat to the whole society in the rudeness and narrow-mindedness with which the new revolutionary government solves problems.

Professor Preobrazhensky

An experimenter who uses innovative developments in solving the problem of rejuvenation through organ transplants. He is a well-known world scientist, a surgeon respected by all, whose "speaking" surname gives him the right to experiment with nature.

Used to live in a big way - servants, a house of seven rooms, chic dinners. His patients are former nobles and the highest revolutionary officials who patronize him.

Preobrazhensky is a solid, successful and self-confident person. The professor - an opponent of any terror and Soviet power, calls them "blathers and idlers." He considers affection the only way to communicate with living beings and denies the new government precisely for radical methods and violence. His opinion: if people are accustomed to culture, then devastation will disappear.

The rejuvenation operation gave an unexpected result - the dog turned into a man. But the man came out completely useless, not amenable to education and absorbing the worst. Philipp Philippovich concludes that nature is not a field for experiments, and he interfered in its laws in vain.

Dr. Bormenthal

Ivan Arnoldovich is completely devoted to his teacher. At one time, Preobrazhensky took an active part in the fate of a half-starved student - he enrolled in the department, and then took him on as an assistant.

The young doctor tried in every possible way to culturally develop Sharikov, and then moved to the professor altogether, as it became more and more difficult to cope with a new person.

The apotheosis was the denunciation that Sharikov wrote against the professor. At the climax, when Sharikov took out a revolver and was ready to use it, it was Bromenthal who showed firmness and rigidity, while Preobrazhensky hesitated, not daring to kill his creation.

The positive characterization of the heroes of "Heart of a Dog" emphasizes how important honor and dignity are for the author. Bulgakov described himself and his relatives in many of the features of both doctors, and in many respects would have acted the same way as they did.

Shvonder

The newly elected chairman of the house committee, who hates the professor as a class enemy. This is a schematic hero, without deep reasoning.

Shvonder completely bows to the new revolutionary government and its laws, and sees in Sharikov not a person, but a new useful unit of society - he can buy textbooks and magazines, participate in meetings.

Sh. can be called Sharikov's ideological mentor, he tells him about the rights in Preobrazhensky's apartment and teaches him to write denunciations. The chairman of the house committee, because of his narrow-mindedness and lack of education, always hesitates and passes in conversations with the professor, but this makes him hate him even more.

Other heroes

The list of characters in the story would not be complete without two au pairs - Zina and Daria Petrovna. They recognize the superiority of the professor, and, like Bormental, are completely devoted to him and agree to commit a crime for the sake of their beloved master. They proved this at the time of the second operation to turn Sharikov into a dog, when they were on the side of the doctors and exactly followed all their instructions.

You got acquainted with the characterization of the heroes of Bulgakov's "Heart of a Dog", a fantastic satire that anticipated the collapse of Soviet power immediately after its appearance - the author, back in 1925, showed the whole essence of those revolutionaries and what they are capable of.

Artwork test